skip to Main Content

From CDM to REDD+ — What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance?

Lederer, Markus. 2011. From CDM to REDD+ — What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance?. Ecological Economics, 70 (11): 1900-1907.

Abstract

This article compares two carbon governance instruments – the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) – to assess lessons from the former for the latter regarding effectiveness and legitimacy of such instruments. The article argues that the CDM has a relatively high degree of output-oriented legitimacy resulting in effectiveness and some input-oriented legitimacy, with few discernible tradeoffs between them. In contrasting this to REDD+, the hypotheses are advanced that (i) output-oriented legitimacy/effectiveness can again be achieved but that (ii) a higher degree of input-oriented legitimacy is necessary for REDD+ and thus also a certain trade-off between the two forms of legitimacy can be expected. This is shown through comparing the technologies and methodologies, economic rationales, political support, regulatory structures, and environmental impacts of both instruments.

Research Highlights

  • The history of the CDM provides valuable lessons for REDD+.
  • Carbon governance rests on output- as well as input-oriented legitimacy.
  • The CDM has a relatively high degree of perceived output-legitimacy.
  • REDD+ will also be effective but will depend on more input-legitimacy.

Keywords:

Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+); Clean Development Mechanism (CDM); Effectiveness; Legitimacy

Recent publications

Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from five years of summits
Five years of climate action and summitry have taught us valuable lessons. Orchestrators of climate action can positively influence performance by setting minimum requirements for credibility and robustness among the initiatives they engage.
Transforming Biodiversity Governance
Edited by Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Marcel T. J. Kok, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
2021 Annual Report
The Earth System Governance Project seeks to mobilise and advance scholarship at the interface between global environmental change and governance. Discover how by learning more about the project in this summary of 2021!