skip to Main Content

PROBLEMSHIFTING: a research programme on the complex dynamics of problem-shifting in global environmental governance

Description

Every month, governments around the world gather to make important decisions to solve global environmental problems. However, their decisions often lead to new, and sometimes even more chronic and severe, environmental problems – what is known as global ‘environmental problem-shifting’. With over a thousand international environmental treaties in force, the scale and complexity of environmental problem-shifting is severe and expected to increase. PROBLEMSHIFTING explains why problem-shifting occurs between international environmental treaties and examines the systemic effects of problem-shifting in global environmental governance. Building on these findings, we offer innovative governance solutions that help ensure our global environmental efforts add up to a net positive impact.

 

Problem-Shifting between International Environmental Treaty Regimes: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions

Context: International environmental treaties are designed to solve specific environmental problems. Yet their potentially negative impact on environmental issues other than their own is rarely studied. Until now global governance theories have assumed that environmental treaties are inherently ‘green’, and hence, any adverse consequences are conveniently set aside as unintended or inevitable. But is that true?

Questions: In this project, we question, do environmental treaties ever pursue their objectives by merely shifting problems to others? If so, when and why? Does such buck-passing create any systemic risk beyond those directly affected? And what might be appropriate responses to ensure our efforts add up to a net positive impact? Environmental problem-shifting, or protecting one part of the environment by damaging another, is a major dilemma arising in global governance. Yet the issue remains under-investigated, requiring an urgent scientific inquiry.

Objectives: PROBLEMSHIFTING examines the causes and consequences of, and provide solutions to, environmental problem-shifting between international environmental treaty regimes. By drawing on our interdisciplinary and multi-method expertise in ‘earth system’ law and governance, we (1) identify and explain the conditions under which problem-shifting occurs; (2) assess and predict the systemic effects of problem-shifting; and (3) offer solutions for optimizing the currently fragmented governance system. We aim to advance the theoretical debate on the architecture of global governance and its overall effectiveness. Building on the theoretical and empirical foundations, we will offer unique insights and valuable advice to markedly improve global governance decisions.

Methods: We employ both small-n qualitative ‘within-case’ and ‘cross-case’ analyses (process tracing and Qualitative Comparative Analysis) and large-n quantitative analyses (network analysis and system dynamics modelling) to understand the causes and consequences of problem-shifting, respectively. In addition, participatory workshops will be organized to co-explore possible governance solutions with stakeholders.

Connection to Earth System Governance Research: With the analytical focus on the complex structure and dynamics of global environmental governance through the lens of ‘problem shifting’, the project draws on and contributes to the literature on the architecture of earth system governance.

 

 

PROBLEMSHIFTING is directed by Dr. Rakhyun E. Kim and hosted at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University in the Netherlands. The programme is funded for five years (2021-2026) through a ‘Starting Grant’ awarded by the European Research Council (Grant agreement No. 949252). For more information, visit https://problemshifting.org/ and follow @PROBLEMSHIFTING on Twitter for latest updates.

You might like these too

Taskforce on Ocean Governance

The Taskforce on Ocean Governance seeks to address the daunting multi-level challenge of oceans governance in…

Taskforce on Planetary Justice

The Planetary Justice Taskforce of the Earth System Governance Project brings together an interdisciplinary group of…

Taskforce on Climate Governance
Climate governance must better reflect characteristics of sectoral systems.

Recent publications

Harnessing Company Climate Action Beyond Paris

The inability of governments to steer the global community towards a safe de-carbonization pathway has left an ‘ambition gap’ between…

A New Paradigm for Social License as a Path to Marine Sustainability

Traditional marine governance can create inferior results. Management decisions customarily reflect fluctuating political priorities and formidable special-interest influence. Governments face…

Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation

A revised version of this working paper has been published as: Schroeder, Heike. 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: the…