skip to Main Content

Working Group on Democracy

Description

The concept of ecological democracy (or green, environmental democracy) revolves around how to make a commitment to environmental protection compatible with democracy. Questions on democracy and democratic legitimacy are central to the scholarship and practice of environmental politics and green political theory. Democratic values, such as representation, inclusion, participation, accountability, and transparency are central research themes in Earth System Governance. There has been a rise in mechanisms to increase participation and accountability on national levels, in global environmental summits and EU governance, such as multi-stakeholder dialogues, institutionalized representation of NGOs, and civil society deliberation. These represent democratic innovations, which have consolidated a model of “participatory” or “bottom up” environmental governance aimed to reduce the “democratic deficit”.

This aim of this working group is to critically explore the tensions and synergies between democracy and environmentalism on local, national and global levels. Eco-authoritarians are skeptical that democracy with its slow and cumbersome process can handle the scale and severity of the global environmental crisis while work on deliberative democracy and environmental citizenship reflects reconciliation between environmental politics and democracy. It will examine how practices of environmental politics relate to various models of democracy – deliberative, representative, stakeholder and participatory. The purpose of the working group is to explore relationships between democracy, expertise and environment, propelled by debates on a post-political turn to environmental politics.

Some key questions are: Can global environmental threats such as climate change be best handled within the institutions of democracy? Alternatively, are democratic polities too slow and cumbersome to handle accelerating global risks? Is direct or deliberative democracy better equipped to handle environmental problems than representative democracy? Do mechanisms to increase representation and participation of civil society and NGOs in international policy processes lead to a democratization of global environmental politics? Or conversely, how can NGOs increase democratic credentials if they are not democratic themselves? Does the de-politicization and scientization of environmental politics lead to post-democratic politics?

Join the Google Group of the Earth System Governance ecological democracy working group.

Co-Conveners

Frederic Hanusch: Frederic.Hanusch@zmi.uni-giessen.de

Aysem Mert

Julia Tschersich

Azucena Moran

More information on Green Democracy:

Baber, Walter, and Robert Bartlett (2005) Deliberative Environmental Politics. Democracy and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bernstein, Steven (2005) Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations 1(1-2), 139-66.

Barry, John and Marcel Wissenburg (eds.) (2001) Sustaining Liberal DemocracyBasingstoke: Palgrave.

Bäckstrand, Karin, Jamil Khan, Annica Kronsell, and Eva Lövbrand, (eds.) (2010) Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy. Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Bäckstrand, Karin (2006) Democratising Global Environmental Governance. Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentEuropean Journal of International Relations 12(4): 467-498.

Doherty, Brian and Marius de Geus (1996) Democracy and Green Political Thought. London and New York: Routledge.

Dryzek, John and Hayley Stevenson (2011) Global Democracy and Earth System GovernanceEcological Economics, 70, 1865-1874.

Lafferty, William and James Meadowcroft (eds.) (1996) Democracy and the Environment. Problem and Prospects. Cheltenham; Edward Elgar.

Fischer, Frank (2000) Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC.Duke University Press.

Held, David and Angus Fane Hervey (2009) Democracy, Climate Change and Global Governance. Policy Network Paper.

Niemeyer, Simon (2014) A Defense of (Deliberative) Democracy in the AnthropoceneEthical Perspectives 21(1):15-45.

Pickering, Jonathan, Karin Bäckstrand, and David Schlosberg (2020) Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 22 (1): 1-15.

Smith, Graham (2003) Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London and New York: Routledge.

Stehr, Nico (2012) An Inconvenient Democracy: Knowledge and Climate ChangeSocial Science and Public Policy.

Stevenson, Hayley and John Dryzek (2014) Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Twitter

Twitter updates

Are you going to the 2022 Toronto Conference? Important advice is to book accommodation *now* (before it's too late)! ⌛️
A list of recommended hotels: https://t.co/0iYjACm2yV

We have the privilege of welcoming @Tzeporah as the keynote speaker at our annual conference in October. This week, she writes in the @guardian why we must accelerate a fair energy transition with @fossiltreaty https://t.co/VbbV3Xepok

Load more tweets

People

Research Fellows
Research Fellows
Scientific Steering Committee

You might like these too

Taskforce on Anticipatory Governance

This taskforce seeks to foster a generation of researchers and practitioners with anticipatory expertise and experience…

Taskforce on Planetary Justice

The Planetary Justice Taskforce of the Earth System Governance Project brings together an interdisciplinary group of…

Taskforce on Earth System Law
The Task Force on Earth System Law is composed of a large member network worldwide, which accommodates an interdisciplinary community of scientists focusing on the legal challenges of the Anthropocene and the many complex, multi-scalar governance challenges arising from within an Earth System context.

Recent publications

Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance

This article reviews recent developments in global carbon governance. The focus is on three emerging trends that result from stalemates…

Governing Sustainability

The crisis of unsustainability is, above all else, a crisis of governance. The transition to a more sustainable world will…

The Discord between International and Australian Approaches to Pesticide Regulation and the Precautionary Principle

This article is premised on three specific and interrelated notions that (a) the reduction of the use of pesticides will…