skip to Main Content

Focusing on Non-State Actions Instead of Non-State Actors in the Context of Sustainability Transitions

Cobut Loïc , Amandine Orsini, Katja Biedenkopf, Mathieu Blondeel, Gerhard Fuchs, Elena Kavvatha, Delphine Misonne, Irene Niet and Marielle Papin, 2019, Focusing on Non-State Actions Instead of Non-State Actors in the Context of Sustainability Transitions. Global Policy

Abstract

Non-state and subnational actors active in sustainability transitions have increased considerably in recent years. However, the term “non-state actors” is not consensual in academia and in policy cycles because of the diversity of their nature, actions, processes, objectives and outcomes.

We defend the opinion that it is actions, rather than actors, that we need to focus on to speed up transitions. We emphasize how talking about non-state actions refocuses the debate on the quality of actions rather than on their origin. Our proposition is to focus on non-state actions according to two trajectory dimensions. First, the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change special report on 1,5°C may serve as a guide. Now, there is no doubt that every action launched by non-state actors must target a net zero emission business plan in the coming months in order to respect the Paris Agreement trajectory. Secondly, actions need to be considered in the light of their potential transformative effects.

A simple way to differentiate them is to name actions that bind both of these dimensions “sustainable actions” and those that do not, “non-sustainable actions”.

Policy Recommendations

  • Instead of losing ground by proposing ideas on how to classify non-state actors, an impossible task, scholars should help policymakers focus attention on non-state actions.
  • Policy makers and scholars should help actors of all kinds to shift towards sustainable actions.
  • Non-state actions should all respect the 1.5°C limit and aim for strong transformative effects.

 

Full article available here

Recent publications

Transforming Biodiversity Governance
Edited by Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Marcel T. J. Kok, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
2021 Annual Report
The Earth System Governance Project seeks to mobilise and advance scholarship at the interface between global environmental change and governance. Discover how by learning more about the project in this summary of 2021!
Transforming Biodiversity Governance

Over fifty years of global conservation has failed to bend the curve of biodiversity loss, so we need to transform…