Skip to content

The Analytic Utility (and Practical Pitfalls) of Accountability

Hoffmann, Matthew. 2016. The Analytic Utility (and Practical Pitfalls) of Accountability. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2): 22-32.

Abstract

This forum provides commentary on five accountability articles in this issue. In response to those pieces, it advances the argument that the study of accountability through the framework proposed by Kramarz and Park (and demonstrated by the empirical articles) can uncover key political dynamics that drive the design of global environmental governance initiatives. The utility of the practical application of accountability measures to ensure good design, rather than proper implementation, is less clear. Using the framework to study accountability does, however, provide an opening for debates over initiative design that may lead to improvements in global environmental governance outcomes.

You might like these publication categories

Recent publications

Special Issue: Knowledge Cumulation in Environmental Governance Research

Environmental governance research has expanded rapidly in recent years in response to mounting sustainability challenges. At the same time, concerns…

Special Issue: Is Goal-setting an Effective Strategy for Global Sustainability Governance?

In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with 17 Sustainable Development Goals…

Earth System Governance – Volume 26

The twenty-sixth volume of Earth System Governance is out now.  The Earth System Governance is an open-access journal for all…